Abstract/Notes: Bu araştırmada çalışma grubunu oluşturan Montessori programı ve MEB programı ile okul öncesi eğitim alan deneme ve kontrol grubu çocukların Bilişsel gelişim ve Sosyal yetkinliklerini karşılaştırmalı olarak incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma çalışma grubunda 2016-2017 eğitim öğretim yılında Selçuk Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi İhsan Doğramacı Anaokulunda Montessori programı ile okul öncesi eğitimi alan 20 ,Esentepe Koleji Anasınıfında MEB programı ile okul öncesi eğitimi alan 20 kontrol olmak üzere toplamda 40 çocuktan oluşmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplamak amacıyla Marmara Gelişim Ölçeğinin alt ölçeği olan Bilişsel Gelişim Ölçeği ve Sosyal Yetkinlik ve Davranış Değerlendirme-30 (SYDD-30) Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Testler deney ve kontrol gruplarına ön ve son test olmak üzere uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen verilerin analizinde Mann Whitney U testi ve Wilcoxon İşaretli sıralar testi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda elde edilen bulgular incelendiğinde; bilişsel gelişim ölçeği son test puanlarının kontrol grubu lehinde bir farklılaşma gösterdiği, Sosyal Yetkinlik ve Davranış Değerlendirme-30 (SYDD-30)ölçeğinin sosyal yetkinlik, Saldırganlık ve Kaygı alt ölçeklerinin son test puanlarında ise anlamlı farklılık bulunamamıştır. / In this study, Montessori curriculum and MEB curriculum(Ministry of Education Preschool Education Curriculum ) which constitute the study group and control group who took pre-school education aimed to examine the children's cognitive development and social competence comparatively. The research study group consists of 40 children, 20 of whom are in pre-school education at the Montessori curriculum in Selcuk University School of Health Sciences Faculty Ihsan Dogramaci Application Kindergarden School, 20 of which are MEB curriculum (Ministry of Education Preschool Education curriculum) at Esentepe College Kindergarden and 20 of which are in pre-school education. The Cognitive Developmental Scale and the Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation-30 (SYDD-30) Scale were used as the subscale of the Marmara Developmental Scale in order to collect data in the study. The tests were performed to the experimental and control groups as pre- and post-test. Mann Whitney U test and Wilcoxon Marked rank test were used for the analysis of the obtained data. When the findings of the research are examined; There was no significant difference in the scores of Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation-30 (SYDD-30) social competence, Aggression and Anxiety subscales, whereas cognitive development scale post test scores showed differentiation in favor of the control group.

Language: Turkish

Published: Konya, Turkey, 2018

Language: English

ISSN: 1071-6246

Language: English

ISSN: 1071-6246

Language: English

ISSN: 0010-700X

Abstract/Notes: Includes information about all the sessions at the conference. Information regarding Montessori includes: 1. Katherine Moore, teacher of the Montessori classes in the public schools of Los Angeles and a graduate of the first class of Dr. Montessori, will conduct a demonstration Montessori class each forenoon [morning] from nine to twelve o'clock during the session of the National Education Association, in the Art Room, City Auditorium [Oakland Municipal Auditorium]. The model furniture will be furnishhed by Louise Brigham the inventor of box furniture, New York, N. Y. Teachers are invited to observe this class. (see p. 6-7) 2. General Sessions - International Congress on Education - Meetings in City Auditorium - August 16, 1915 - Afternoon Session, 2:30 O'Clock - "The Montessori System" by Maria Montessori (see p. 13). 3. Departmental Congress on Kindergarten Education - Sessions in Auditorium Theatre - August 17, 1915 - Afternoon Session, 2:30 O'Clock (Joint Session with the International Kindergarten Union) - "Imagination" by Maria Montessori (see p. 15). 4. Departmental Congress on Elementary Education - Sessions in City Auditorium - August 20, 1915 - Evening Session, 8:00 O'Clock - "Organization of the Intellectual Work in the School" by Maria Montessori (see p. 20). 5. Departmental Congress on Relationship Between the School and Co-operative Organizations - City Auditorium - August 23, 1915 - Evening Session, 8:00 O'Clock - "The Mother and the Child" by Maria Montessori, interpreted by Mariana Bertola, M.D. of San Francisco (see p. 25). 6. Montessori Congress - Sessions in Ballroom, Hotel Oakland - August 28, 1915 (see p. 42-43). This includes details regarding the itinerary for the Montessori Congress held in Oakland, 1915. The morning session began at 10:00 O'Clock and included: "Address of Welcome" by Philander P. Claxton (US Commissioner of Education, Washington, D.C.); "Possibilities and Opportunities of the Montessori Work for American Children" by E. L. Hardy (State Normal School, San Diego); "The Future of the Montessori School in America" by Arthur Chamberlain (Secretary, California Council of Education and California Teachers' Association, San Francisco); and "Address" by Maria Montessori. The afternoon session began at 2:00 O'Clock and included: "Round Table under the Auspices of the National Education Association and of the San Francisco Local Committee of Advisory Patrons" with David Starr Jordan (President, National Education Association, Stanford University, California) presiding over "Questions and Discussions by Leading American Educators and Dr. Montessori". The program indicates that the Round Table discussion was an invitation only affair - "Admission by Invitation".

Language: English

Published: 1915

Language: English

Published: New York: American Montessori Internationale of the United States (AMI/USA), 1997

Abstract/Notes: Multiage is an instructional design whereby students from two or more grades are blended together into a learning community that progresses with the same teacher(s) for two or more years. This book was designed to help teachers and administrators explore, implement, and evaluate their multiage program. The book is presented in four parts. The first three parts share a consistent format and include a series of checklists and charts for participating educators to complete. Part 1, "Exploring the Multiage Classroom," examines the multiage classroom, reasons for its implementation, and the kinds of instructional practices commonly associated with it. Part 2, "Implementing the Multiage Classroom," presents the steps involved in planning the instructional design associated with a multiage classroom. Part 3, "Evaluating the Multiage Classroom," provides assistance in establishing an evaluation process for the multiage instructional design, clarifying the elements to be evaluated and how

Language: English

Published: Peterborough, New Hampshire: Crystal Springs Books, 1999

ISBN: 1-884548-26-1

Language: English

Published: Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972

ISBN: 978-0-8018-1370-2 0-8018-1370-0

Abstract/Notes: In vorliegender Arbeit wird der Frage nachgegangen, ob "guter" (Mathematik-) Unterricht mit den Methoden Maria MONTESSORIs verwirklicht werden kann. Es wird untersucht, ob zwischen den Mathematikleistungen von RegelschülerInnen und MontessorischülerInnen vierter Klassen an Volksschulen Unterschiede bestehen. Zur Überprüfung der Hypothese "Es besteht kein Unterschied in den Mathematikleistungen von Schülerinnen und Schülern vierter Klassen in Montessorieinrichtungen und Regelvolksschulklassen" wurden an die 300 ProbandInnen aus Montessorieinrichtungen und Regelschulen mit dem "Mathematik-Schulleistungstest für SchülerInnen vierter Klassen der Grundschule" (HANISCH 2004) getestet. Die empirische Untersuchung und Auswertung der erhobenen Daten zeigt Unterschiede im Bereich der Mathematikleistungen, die zu Gunsten der MontessorischülerInnen ausfallen. Es wird jedoch darauf hingewiesen, dass die Stichprobe relativ klein war, da sich nur wenige Klassen zu einer Testung bereit erklärten. Auch die intellektuelle Ausgangslage der Kinder sowie der soziokulturelle Hintergrund der Getesteten konnten nicht berücksichtigt werden. Das vorliegende Resultat muss daher als "Zwischenergebnis" betrachtet werden. / This paper addresses the issue of whether "good" (mathematics) learning and teaching can be realised with the MONTESSORI method. The performance in mathematics of pupils attending standard, mainstream schools and those attending MONTESSORI schools is examined and compared. Both groups of subjects were in their fourth year of primary education. In order to corroborate the following hypothesis: "There is no difference in achievement between the two groups of pupils" about 300 pupils attending standard schools and those attending MONTESSORI schools were tested applying the "School achievement test in mathematics for pupils in their fourth year of primary education" (HANISCH 2004). The empirical examination and analysis of collected data shows differences in the performance of pupils in mathematics with favourable results for pupils working with the MONTESSORI method. However, it must be pointed out that the sample was relatively small as only few classes were willing to be tested. In addition to this, neither the intellectual abilities of the children nor their socio-cultural background were taken into consideration. Therefore the present result must be seen as provisional.

Language: German

Published: Wien, Austria, 2007

Abstract/Notes: Lottery-based identification strategies offer potential for generating the next generation of evidence on U.S.

Language: English

Published: Providence, Rhode Island, Feb 2023