Language: English

ISSN: 1054-0040

Language: German

DOI: 10.5169/seals-901872

ISSN: 1424-845X

Language: English, French, German

DOI: 10.5169/seals-330152

ISSN: 1663-0629

Abstract/Notes: Describes three projects: (1) the Laufenburg Ranch Project, a historical organic farm and agricultural and environmental education center; (2) the Hershey Montessori School's efforts to teach adolescents about the earth; and (3) the Lake Country School, which developed a farm campus and nature center as an integral part of its educational program.

Language: English

ISSN: 1522-9734

Abstract/Notes: L’articolo presenta una ricerca basata sull’osservazione di un contesto educativo di ispirazione montessoriana. La ricerca intendeva mettere in luce gli atteggiamenti, le proposte e le strategie delle educatrici, e le risposte dei bambini a queste sollecitazioni. Il testo si articola in una introduzione metodologica che illustra il tipo di servizio educativo, la metodologia di osservazione adottata e la traccia che ha gui-dato le osservazioni; seguono alcune considerazioni sull’autonomia del bambino, l’attenzione al singolo bambino e la cura del bambino, emerse dalla analisi delle osservazioni; conclude l’articolo la trascrizione di una delle tre osservazioni condotte. [The paper presents an observational study carried on in an early educational context inspired to Montessori approach. It is aimed at illustrating the educators’ attitudes, behaviours, and educational strategies and the children’s reactions to them. First, the educational approach of the centre and the observational methodology are described. Then, a detailed analysis of the observations with regard to the educators’ support to child autonomy, attention to children’s requests and needs, and care behaviours is presented. Finally, the transcript of a whole observation is reported.]

Language: Italian

DOI: 10.6092/issn.1970-2221/1760

ISSN: 1970-2221

Abstract/Notes: Article presented at International Workshop “Children and Families; critical issues and socio-cultural resources”, Bologna October 16th 2009.

Language: Italian

DOI: 10.6092/issn.1970-2221/1772

ISSN: 1970-2221

Abstract/Notes: El propósito de este estudio fue estudiar las similitudes y diferencias en el grado de desarrollo motor grueso en alumnos/as que son estimulados motrizmente con el método tradicional y con el método Montessori utilizando el test de desarrollo de la motricidad gruesa de Ulrich (TGMD-2). El segundo objetivo de nuestra investigación consistió en realizar un análisis de correlación entre las habilidades motrices evaluadas en el TGMD-2. Carrera, galope, salto con 1 pie, zancada, salto horizontal con dos pies, carrera lateral (subpruebas de locomoción), bateo, bote estático, recepción, patada, lanzamiento por arriba y lanzamiento por abajo (subpruebas de control de objetos) fueron evaluadas en 35 educandos de 4 a 5 años que procedían de ambos centros. El principal hallazgo de este estudio fue que el alumnado del centro tradicional obtuvo mayores puntuaciones en todas las variables analizadas, excepto en el salto horizontal con 2 pies y la patada, siendo significativamente superiores en las habilidades de carrera, galope, bote estático, recepción y lanzamiento por arriba. No hubo diferencias significativas en el resto de variables. Por otra parte, al estudiar el grado de correlación entre las variables derivadas del TGMD-2, se observó que se establecen correlaciones significativas entre varios de los aspectos motores incluidos en los subtests de locomoción y control de objetos, indicando por tanto el grado de dependencia que existe entre ellos. Nosotros concluimos que el método tradicional es más adecuado para que los estudiantes desarrollen sus habilidades motrices gruesas que el método Montessori. [The purpose of this study was to study the similarities and differences in the degree of gross motor development in students who are motor stimulated with the traditional method and with the Montessori method using the Ulrich gross motor development test (TGMD-2). ). The second objective of our research was to carry out a correlation analysis between the motor skills evaluated in the TGMD-2. Running, galloping, 1-foot hop, stride, two-foot horizontal jump, lateral running (locomotion subtests), batting, static dribbling, receiving, kicking, overhand throw, and underhand throw (object control subtests) were assessed. in 35 students from 4 to 5 years old who came from both centers. The main finding of this study was that the students of the traditional center obtained higher scores in all the variables analyzed, except in the horizontal jump with 2 feet and the kick, being significantly higher in the skills of running, galloping, static boat, reception and kick. throw over the top There were no significant differences in the rest of the variables. On the other hand, when studying the degree of correlation between the variables derived from the TGMD-2, it was observed that significant correlations are established between several of the motor aspects included in the locomotion and object control subtests, thus indicating the degree of dependence that exists between them. We conclude that the traditional method is more suitable for students to develop their gross motor skills than the Montessori method.]

Language: Spanish

Published: Seville, Spain, 2017

Language: Italian

ISSN: 2239-5326

Language: Italian

ISSN: 2239-5326

Abstract/Notes: Text revised and updated as of December 1995; Extract from: Il Quaderno Montessori, (autunno 1993), n. 39.

Language: Italian

Published: Busto Arsizio, Italy: Linea grafica, 1995